With an increase in the residential building market forecasted for 2014, the demand for concrete across North America is expected to follow suit. Extensive evidence shows us that concrete structures around the world are not meeting their designed service life, due to rapid deterioration – all of which is caused by the transport of fluids and moisture through the concrete. Concrete structures have traditionally had a design life of 50 to 100 years. Unfortunately, many of today’s structures are not living up to expectations.
Much of the concrete infrastructure currently in service across North America is badly in need of repair or replacement in as little as five to 10 years after construction. This premature deterioration is at a huge cost to owners, taking precious financial resources away from planned infrastructure growth, or other local initiatives that could involve both private and public spending in more productive ways.
Sources of concrete deterioration
Water is the main source of premature deterioration. It is concrete’s ultimate aggressor, directly corroding the surface of concrete, but also by carrying chemical contaminants deep into the concrete structure.
Contaminants such as salt will corrode the steel reinforcement within the structure, and can be introduced through water or moisture carrying them through capillary pores within the concrete. Sulfate contaminants, alkali reactive aggregates, and water can cause disruptive expansion, once absorbed by the sponge-like concrete pores.
When designing and building a structure, mitigating water ingress through concrete is critical to the project’s overall integrity and durability
Permeability, durability and sustainability
As the permeability of concrete directly affects the structure’s overall durability, it is critical to mitigate water’s ability to infiltrate through permeability in order to increase durability and, thus, support the sustainability of these types of infrastructure. Sustainability is a concern, now more than ever, with infrastructure expansion and population growth occurring worldwide.
The durability and longevity of a structure directly impacts the environmental footprint that structure creates. By using sustainable practices and materials that enhance the durability of our infrastructure, we are supporting a long-term initiative toward building better, longer lasting cities.
So what choices do we have when selecting a product that will address these concerns? Creating a durable structure is more than just applying a one-size-fits-all solution and forgetting about it. To prevent the destruction caused by water permeability, the immediate and future purpose of the structure – as well as its unique location needs and water infiltration risks – must be carefully evaluated.
If a structure is at high risk of water permeation, selecting the appropriate waterproofing product can greatly reduce the need for costly repairs or premature replacement.
Protecting concrete from water has traditionally been accomplished by separating it with a membrane of some kind. Typically, membranes are applied to the concrete surface either as a liquid coating or as flexible sheets joined together. While they have been used in many projects, these approaches have a few common setbacks:
Desirable properties in a sustainable concrete waterproofing solution
To overcome these vulnerabilities, a proven option to reducing concrete’s permeability is to turn the concrete into the water barrier by using a permeability reducing admixture.
Permeability Reducing Admixtures are outlined by the American Concrete Institute’s 212.3R-10 Report on Chemical Admixture as PRAH and PRAN classifications.
PRAH: Permeability Reducing Admixture – Hydrostatic Conditions
PRAH products reduce water penetration through crystalline growth, can perform under hydrostatic pressure, and are suitable for watertight construction.
PRAN: Permeability Reducing Admixture – Non-Hydrostatic Conditions
PRAN admixtures reduce water absorption by repellent chemicals (soap, oils) or partial pore blocking (fine particle fillers). These admixtures are not suitable for concrete exposed to water under pressure and cannot protect in the presence of hydrostatic pressure. Waterproofing against hydrostatic pressure is an important distinction that sets PRAHs apart from PRANs.
Many concrete structures that are at the greatest risk of water damage are those that have below-grade levels, and are located near a body of water. Hydrostatic pressure is created when the combination of fluid and soil pressure force water into the concrete itself – sometimes strong enough to break or penetrate surface-applied waterproofing efforts.
Other desirable properties to look for in a sustainable concrete waterproofing solution include:
Consider each of the factors above to determine the true cost of your concrete waterproofing decision. What ultimately will be determined is the overall value – long and short term – that each of your choices would bring to the table. Naturally, the best selection would be the option that gives the best and greatest value to the project at hand. Knowing all of the variables takes the risk out of concrete waterproofing, and is the first step in achieving a durable, sustainable structure.
Kevin Yuers, B.A., is VP responsible for product development and technical services for Kryton International, a crystalline concrete waterproofing company. Yuers is an active member of several industry and business associations. He has written numerous articles and is the named inventor on patents related to the concrete industry. He can be contacted at email kevin@kryton.com.
Source: Masonry Magazine
